How to Use AI Ethically: 5 Real-Life Examples of Right and Wrong AI Use
- Ashley Kelly

- Aug 4
- 4 min read
Where’s the Line Between Smart AI Use and Cheating?
Artificial Intelligence tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DALL·E, and GitHub Copilot are becoming as commonplace as search engines and calculators. However, as with any powerful tool, there’s a fine line between using AI to enhance creativity and productivity and crossing into unethical territory like cheating or plagiarism. In this article, we will look at some of the gray areas and shed light on how to use AI responsibly. I will walk through five real-world scenarios to show both the wrong way (which edges into dishonesty or misrepresentation) and the right way (which showcases ethical, smart usage). If you’ve ever wondered, “Is this crossing the line?”, then this blog post is for you.

Scenario 1: AI in Education: Writing an Essay with ChatGPT
Wrong Way: Submitting AI-Generated Work Without Edits
Jamie has a history paper due tomorrow and pastes the prompt into ChatGPT, then submits the AI-generated essay word-for-word. She never reviews the accuracy of the writing, never adjusts the text to match their voice, doesn't do any further research to ensure that the essay is accurate, and she doesn't even cite the AI’s contribution.
Why It’s Unethical:
The work isn’t Jamie’s thinking or writing.
Jamie risks factual errors, hallucinations, or misinterpretations.
Jamie violates academic integrity by submitting uncredited AI content as their own.
Right Way: Using AI to Plan, Not Replace, Your Essay
Research Booster: Jamie asks ChatGPT for an outline or summary of key events to clarify their understanding.
Personal Voice: She writes the essay in her own words, weaving in personal analysis and citations.
Research Skills: Jamie misses the chance to hone her research skills and gain the confidence that they can factually back up what she has written.
Outcome: Jamie deepens their comprehension, retains original authorship, gets more experience doing proper research, and acknowledges AI’s support.
Scenario 2: AI in Software Development: Coding with GitHub Copilot
Wrong Way: Copying Code Without Understanding or Testing
Alex pastes the specifications for a custom sorting algorithm into Copilot and simply accepts the code without reading or testing it. She drops it into production as-is, without testing or understanding what she did, unaware of potential bugs.
Why It’s Unethical (and Risky):
Alex treats AI like a code vending machine, bypassing learning.
She may introduce unnoticed security flaws or logic errors.
Alex claims full credit despite minimal comprehension.
Right Way: Reviewing, Testing, and Customizing AI-Suggested Code
Learning Tool: Alex uses Copilot to suggest a template, then steps through the code line by line, checking that they understand what is happening in the logic.
Customization: Alex adapts the logic to her specific needs and ensures that the code is written according to the guidelines of the project that they are submitting to.
Testing: Alex gets more experience writing unit tests and using whatever other testing tools required for the project.
Outcome: Alex improves productivity without sacrificing code quality or personal growth.
Scenario 3: AI in Content Creation: Writing a Blog Post with AI
Wrong Way: Publishing AI Text Without Personal Input
Sasha runs a niche wellness blog and asks an AI to generate a 1,000‑word article on meditation benefits. She publishes it verbatim under their byline, without any edits or personal anecdotes.
Why It’s Unethical:
The article lacks originality or unique insights.
Readers expect Sasha’s personal expertise, not a generic AI spin.
Search engines may downgrade duplicate or low-quality AI content, affecting SEO for optimal reach.
Right Way: Adding Your Voice, Story, and Credibility to AI Help
Idea Generator: Sasha prompts the AI for a list of fresh angles or research studies.
Personalization: Sasha selects a few points and infuses the post with personal stories and client case studies.
Value Add: She verifies any facts with reputable sources, linking back to studies or interviews.
Outcome: Sasha’s blog remains authentic, trustworthy, engaging, and informative.
Scenario 4: AI in Job Applications: Resume Writing with AI Tools
Wrong Way: Inflating Achievements with Generic AI Phrases
Taylor feeds their resume bullet points into an AI resume builder, then copies the embellished, jargon‑filled output without adjusting it to their real experience.
Why It’s Unethical (and Unwise):
Taylor can’t back up the claims if asked to elaborate in an interview.
Risk of overpromising and underdelivering.
Misrepresentation can damage your reputation.
Right Way: Polishing Your Resume While Staying Truthful
Draft Enhancement: Taylor writes bullet points in her own words, then asks AI to suggest improvements for clarity or impact based on the desired position.
Fact‑Checking: She cross‑references each bullet to ensure accuracy and honesty.
Interview Prep: Taylor can confidently rehearse personal stories that demonstrate each skill in action.
Outcome: Taylor’s polished resume is true to life and interview-ready.
Scenario 5: AI in Art and Design: Using AI for Portfolio Pieces
Wrong Way: Claiming AI Art as Original Work
Morgan needs quick concept art for a client and uses an AI image generator to produce images that they submit as 100% her own original work.
Why It’s Unethical:
Misleads the client about the creative process and skill level.
Raises copyright and licensing concerns over AI‑generated assets.
Devalues the craft of illustration.
Right Way: Using AI as a Sketch Tool and Adding Your Touch
Idea Exploration: Morgan experiments with AI prompts to explore composition, lighting, or color palettes.
Personal Craftsmanship: A few of the results spark new ideas, and Morgan sketches a completely new version by hand, applying her own composition, style, and creative decisions.
Artist Growth: Morgan sharpens her artistic abilities, expands their visual vocabulary, and develops original work that truly reflects her growth as an artist.
Outcome: Morgan accelerates ideation while preserving artistic integrity and honing her skills.
Responsible AI Use = Creativity + Integrity
By understanding these boundaries, you can harness AI’s power responsibly to boost productivity, sparking creativity, and maintaining trust without ever crossing into cheating or plagiarism.
Ethical AI Use Checklist: Stay Creative and Honest
AI as Partner, Not Replacement: Treat AI like a co‑pilot, not a ghostwriter or autopilot.
Own Your Voice: Always add your unique perspective, expertise, or creativity.
Cite and Disclose: When AI materially contributes, acknowledge it.
Verify and Validate: Double‑check facts, code, or designs for errors and biases.
Stay Informed: AI ethics and policies evolve rapidly; keep learning and adapting.



Comments